<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:41, Daniel Vetter <<a href="mailto:daniel@ffwll.ch">daniel@ffwll.ch</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div class="im">On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27:49PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter <<a href="mailto:daniel@ffwll.ch">daniel@ffwll.ch</a>> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Daniel Stone <<a href="mailto:daniel@fooishbar.org">daniel@fooishbar.org</a>> wrote: > > > > Does what it says on the box. > > > > > > Danvet can you please test this on your elderly i810 box and make sure > > > we don't accidentally open the can of worms. Any sign of regressions? > > > > Why don't we just rip it out entirely? If a bored soul ever ports this > > driver to kms we likely just need to reimplement proper accel with sna, so > > I don't think there's much value. > > If we did rip it out, what happens? The X server uses the vesa driver, > which is equivalent to i810 for modesetting, no 3d support, no overlays, > and no accelerated blits (which is dying anyway). Am I right in thinking > that after removal of XAA, the legacy i810 offers no more functionality > or performance than is available through VESA? </div>Afaict we're still have left - dri1 for glxgears </blockquote><div> Wasn't DRI1 ripped from mesa as well? </div></div> -- Eugeni Dodonov<a href="http://eugeni.dodonov.net/" target="_blank"> </a>