<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 07:35, Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> With the introduction of the PCH, we gained an LVDS presence pin but we continued to use the existing logic that asserted that LVDS was only supported on certain mobile chipsets. However, there are desktop IronLake systems with LVDS attached which we fail to detect. So for PCH, trust the LVDS presence pin and quirk all the lying manufacturers. Reported-by: Daniel Woff <<a href="mailto:wolff.daniel@gmail.com">wolff.daniel@gmail.com</a>> Bugzilla: <a href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43171" target="_blank">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43171</a> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>> </blockquote><div> Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <<a href="mailto:eugeni.dodonov@intel.com">eugeni.dodonov@intel.com</a>> I think it is a valid use-case for LVDS connections for the all-in-one and similar machines. They don't necessarily have to be mobile, but they can have a LVDS connection. </div></div> -- Eugeni Dodonov<a href="http://eugeni.dodonov.net/" target="_blank"> </a>