On 12/11/12 21:12, Marius Kotsbak wrote: > Well, shouldn't it be 0.y.z as long as we can't be sure the ABI is not > broken? Maybe until a MM 0.7.x depending on libqmi is released? I don't really think it's a big deal; we can always release a 2.0 tomorrow if that happens :-) -- Aleksander