<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">clap clap<br>
a.l.e<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:ca54d6453ea6effdeab9499e5b28e01a.squirrel@mail.domainepublic.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">ok, so I'll decide it is finished ;-)
Please circulate widely!
F
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">hi
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">IIRC it was planned to get the CFP out today, however I haven't seen any
discussions on this list about the content nor a draft for people to
approve.
Is there any reason this didn't happen? Can we expect to see the CFP
soonish? After all you originally wanted to release it even earlier.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">does anybody know who is supposed to
a/ write
b/ publish
the CFP?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">I have to admit that I am seriously confused now. There have been three
IRC
meetings of the content team for precisely this – the CFP. On Thursday
Femke
asked for some help on finishing the draft on this list. And according
to what
you decided in Madrid [0] the content team is
content = [Jon,Øyvind,Femke,Aleksandre?,Ale]. Purpose: Make sure we have
the
right presentations, workshops, people.
So you are among the people responsible for the CFP and don't know it? I
hope
that this is not the overall state of the LGM organization ...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
all in all, since this is the official channel for discussions on the
LGM organization, i don't think that it's a bad thing to ask in here.
if i look at the notes, in <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lgm2014.titanpad.com/1">http://lgm2014.titanpad.com/1</a> i don't see who
is responsible for finalizing and sending the call.
jon and pipping were in charge to prepare a draft.
and i've also read that femke was going to finish some tweaking on it...
personally, i think that the current "problem" is that nobody has
"decided" that the CFP is finalized.
and i hope that the current silence means "we are all busy" and "we
don't see any need for further changes".
so, if nobody comes up with any critics to the CFP as published on
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lgm2014.titanpad.com/1">http://lgm2014.titanpad.com/1</a> (line 178), i will publish it this evening
CET:
- on the lgm website (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://libregraphicsmeeting.org/2014/?page_id=85">http://libregraphicsmeeting.org/2014/?page_id=85</a>)
- on the create mailing list
- on g+
greetings
a.l.e
_______________________________________________
Libre-graphics-meeting mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Libre-graphics-meeting@lists.freedesktop.org">Libre-graphics-meeting@lists.freedesktop.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-graphics-meeting">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-graphics-meeting</a>
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Libre-graphics-meeting mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Libre-graphics-meeting@lists.freedesktop.org">Libre-graphics-meeting@lists.freedesktop.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-graphics-meeting">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-graphics-meeting</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>