<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Liberation Serif">As it currently exists, the Call seems
a blind sinkhole. Presumably, people are making proposals (how many?
we don't know)( what kind? we don't know).<br>
I wonder at what point there will be some publishing of what is
being offered/proposed, so that those visiting the site can have a
look-see.<br>
<br>
I think this should be an aspect of openness, that we communicate
what's going on as the meeting develops, which will hopefully
generate some interest, maybe even some feedback about how things
are going.<br>
<br>
In regard to that last element, maybe there is some capacity to
allow for some visitor feedback that can be publicly displayed
(after some moderation?). I don't know how the site works. Let's
think about the psychology of generating emotional interest in LGM
2014. When we get to the point that LGM comes out of a can, and
can't be spontaneous, can't be reinvented, we're in trouble.<br>
<br>
Greg<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>