[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 40788] FORMATTING - Calc ignores manual breaks when "fit to number of pages" is chosen

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40788

--- Comment #20 from Karl Behler <karl.behler at ipp.mpg.de> 2011-09-28 15:52:27 PDT ---
Rainer,

I meanwhile analysed the history of this bug back to the first design 
document (thanks to your reference to it) > --- Comment #3 from Rainer 
Bielefeld <LibreOffice at bielefeldundbuss.de> 2011-09-12 02:16:41 PDT ---
> I found to old OOo specifications on
> <http://specs.openoffice.org/calc/index.html>, none of them helps to find out
> what might have been intended behavior. Also Help and documentation do not
> clarify priority.
>
> The new behavior is intended, please see mentioned OOo bug No 54993. I agree
> with intentions of that fix.
and further on to a couple of filed bugs together with the attached 
sample documents.
In my opinion the last change should be reverted and the old behaviour 
which was valid until release 3.2 should be reinstalled. Since at least 
one of the sample documents has a logical error, which was wrongly 
analysed and led to a false conclusion.
I would like it very much if we could leave this bug open until I have 
the opportunity to make the results of my analysis completely clear. 
It's a bit complicated and I will need more time to write it down.
(It also needs a description why the old behaviour is important and why 
here LibreOffice should behave better than Excel does.)

Regards,
Karl

Am 28.09.2011 10:33, schrieb bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40788
>
> Rainer Bielefeld<LibreOffice at bielefeldundbuss.de>  changed:
>
>             What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                   CC|                            |kohei.yoshida at gmail.com
>
> --- Comment #19 from Rainer Bielefeld<LibreOffice at bielefeldundbuss.de>  2011-09-28 01:33:02 PDT ---
> @Karl Behler
> Unfortunately nobody answered to my questions on the mailing lists.
> I can understand that automatic page breaks will be ignored, but the reason to
> ignore manually inserted breaks is difficult to understand.
>
> @Kohei:
> Can you remember or imagine why the behavior has been modified? There might
> have been good reasons, but reporter's arguments in comment 17 also are good,
> and I find no way to fulfill his needs with the current behavior.
>

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.