[Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - configure.in

Lubos Lunak l.lunak at suse.cz
Tue Apr 17 01:11:01 PDT 2012


On Tuesday 17 of April 2012, TomXXXX ChvXXtal wrote:
>  configure.in |    7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> New commits:
> commit f9f8d9ac12979e7ec2f269e7f42f1408da9b6795
> Author: Tomas Chvatal <tchvatal at suse.cz>
> Date:   Tue Apr 17 09:57:19 2012 +0200
>
>     --enable-ext-languagetool requires --with-java now bit more sanely.
>
> diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
> index d1dff86..13cc862 100644
> --- a/configure.in
> +++ b/configure.in
> @@ -9655,7 +9655,7 @@ dnl
> =================================================================== dnl
> Test whether to include LanguageTool extension
>  dnl ===================================================================
>  AC_MSG_CHECKING([for LanguageTool extension integration])
> -if test "x$enable_ext_languagetool" = "xyes" -a
> "x$enable_extension_integration" != "xno"; then +if test
> "x$enable_ext_languagetool" = "xyes" -a "x$enable_extension_integration" !=
> "xno" -a "x$with_java" != "xno"; then BUILD_TYPE="$BUILD_TYPE LANGUAGETOOL"
>      SCPDEFS="$SCPDEFS -DWITH_EXTENSION_LANGUAGETOOL"
>      AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])

 How is this sane? Somebody passes --enable-ext-languagetool and configure 
will simply ignore it (even without giving a warning, not that it would 
change that much)?

-- 
 Lubos Lunak
 l.lunak at suse.cz


More information about the Libreoffice-commits mailing list