[Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version Picker items – 2

Florian Reisinger reisi.007 at t-online.de
Fri Jun 8 23:58:04 PDT 2012


Hi!

Here an older mail...
It was not sent to the list, only to Rainer...
I skipped everything, but my schema...

Am 07.06.2012 15:01, schrieb Florian Reisinger:
> Hi there!
> [...]
>>
> [Second schema]
>> 3.6.0.00x for alphas
>> 3.6.0.0x0 for betas
>> 3.6.0.100 for RC (example) and/or release
>> 3.6.0.200 for RC (example) and/or release
>> 3.6.0.200 for release(example)
> I would skip the zeros at the end:
>
> 3.6.0.00x for alphas
> 3.6.0.0x for betas
> 3.6.0.1 for RC (example) and/or release
> 3.6.0.2 for RC (example) and/or release
> 3.6.0.2 for release (example)
>
> What about:
> 3.6.0a1 for Alpha 1
> 3.6.0b3 for Beta 3
> // We could simplify the alpha and beta to e.g. 3.6b1 Problem: IMHO 
> not that easy sortable...
> *3.6.4r3* for the release (or rc) of 3.6.4 *fourth* candidate) --> In 
> most of the cases X.Y.Zr1 would be the published version!!
> [...]


-- 
Bye! | Tschüss!

Florian Reisinger

@Windows 7 x64 SP1
-
Skype: reisi.007



More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list