[Libreoffice-qa] fdo#33302 Hard Hack + proposed change to process

Joel Madero jmadero.dev at gmail.com
Fri Oct 5 10:23:16 PDT 2012


I'm cleaning up and adding fixed hard hacks to the wiki and this mac one is
annoying me :) I think we should have a policy that if the hard hack isn't
accepted by a developer within 1 month, we should move it either a) back to
proposed or b) to a new category of "need a volunteer, currently pending"
or some other such status. I think the idea of hard hacks should be fast
paced, where users can expect if the bug is on the list, it's going to get
fixed. Otherwise it has the potential of sitting on the list for much too
long and just cluttering an otherwise really stream lined process.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33302

Any thoughts?


Regards,
Joel

-- 
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero.dev at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/attachments/20121005/c3ccb1d5/attachment.html>


More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list