<html><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><META name="Author" content="Novell GroupWise WebAccess"></head><body style='font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; '>Hi Sophie, Thanks for following this :) I am looking forward to your further input. > I'll test more in depth Moztrap tomorrow. For information, I was > unable to login using Chrome but it was ok with Firefox. How does it look like when failing to login with Chrome? There is an issue related with "CSRF veirication" need to follow in current our Moztrap instance. It happens in both Chrome and Firefox randomly, though *refreshing* times of the page will get through the annoying message. Please see: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Moztrap/Moztrap_User_Guide#Registration_and_Login Did you meet the similar problem or something else? BTW. I have added you in the test manager group so that you can play with more features :) Best wishes, Yifan On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 07:37:17PM +0200, Sophie Gautier wrote: > Hi Yifan, all, > On 23/08/2012 11:59, Petr Mladek wrote: > >Yi Fan Jiang píše v St 22. 08. 2012 v 21:08 -0600: > >>we will need to have a temporary workaround to *adapt* translation > >>version of test cases existed in Moztrap. > >> > >>Based on the capacity of current Moztrap, we currently have 3 > >>prototypes of how they can be presented. I populated all these into > >>three actual test cases: > >> > >>http://vm12.documentfoundation.org/runtests/run/29/env/633/ > > First, thanks a lot for working on this. Just for your information, > I'm currently searching for funds to hack Moztrap localization. I'll > keep you update on my progress here. > > > >I prefer the first version. It best follows the current Moztrap design. > >The step and expected result are close to each other and better > >visualized. Also it should be easier to convert this to the real > >localized framework once we have it. > > > >The second solution is more compact but the step and the result is > >connected by the strange "vpX" identifiers. In addition, it would be > >more complicated to keep all localizations in sync. > > > >The third variant looks to confusing to me :-) > > Agreed that the last solution is really confusing. I think that the > second would be the easier one or the most comfortable for language > teams (I've noticed though that it's not the best solution for the > test migration in the future). However, not to be alone to give my > opinion, I've asked the FR project some feedback on the different > presentations. I'll keep you update also on this. > I'll test more in depth Moztrap tomorrow. For information, I was > unable to login using Chrome but it was ok with Firefox. > > Kind regards > Sophie > _______________________________________________ > List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list > Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org > Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa > Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ -- Yifan Jiang Libreoffice / SuSE Contact: yifan - irc.freenode.net/libreoffice ============================================= http://www.libreoffice.org/ http://www.documentfoundation.org/ </body></html>