<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/05/2014 03:48 AM, Andras Timar
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAKqTfXZ=OkfV4C5wG+oN4nEcwmb_MM_=0CL-nLNsFa61hpNQLQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Dan Lewis <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:elderdanlewis@gmail.com"><elderdanlewis@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
There was a bug (regression) involving Base first appearing in 4.0.0
and fixed in 4.3.2.1. My question: will the bug fix be back ported to 4.2.7?
If not, then Base 4.2.7 is not of much use to anyone with complex forms.
FYI: it involved a subform which had a subform. Whether it is back ported or
not, it does need to be mentioned in the release notes as a problem that is
not solved until 4.3.2.1.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
What is the bug number? Sometimes a fix was not backported, because
the author did not have a 4.2 build to test and did not care that much
about the old stable branch. If this was the case, then we can still
do it.
Regards,
Andras
</pre>
</blockquote>
<font face="DejaVu Sans"> Here are three bug report numbers:
72696, 82150, 82720. The first of these was mine and based upon
4.2.0.0 beta 2. (Bug 82151 is similar and has a list of 8
duplicate bug reports.)<br>
<br>
Dan<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>