<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial black,sans-serif;font-size:large">issues here? </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial black,sans-serif;font-size:large"> 97 conversion seems to slip something in. (injects weirdness, ie xml ebooks gets blank pages.) </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial black,sans-serif;font-size:large"> I think it's int 10; handing line feed is wonky in other format conversions. </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"> <div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">E-BOOKS : SF+Fantasy novels comics by Kevin Williams <a href="https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/packrat2" target="_blank">https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/packrat2</a> -novels (cartoons, sf+fan) <a href="http://packrat.comicgenesis.com" target="_blank">http://packrat.comicgenesis.com</a> -comics <a href="http://www.youtube.com/area163" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/area163</a> -film ------ </div><div> Always remember kiddies, that Mickysoft *IS* the great satan. Monsanto is just evil. </div></div></div></div></div> <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:00 PM, <<a href="mailto:libreoffice-qa-request@lists.freedesktop.org" target="_blank">libreoffice-qa-request@lists.freedesktop.org</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Send Libreoffice-qa mailing list submissions to <a href="mailto:libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org">libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org</a> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa</a> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to <a href="mailto:libreoffice-qa-request@lists.freedesktop.org">libreoffice-qa-request@lists.freedesktop.org</a> You can reach the person managing the list at <a href="mailto:libreoffice-qa-owner@lists.freedesktop.org">libreoffice-qa-owner@lists.freedesktop.org</a> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Libreoffice-qa digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Question regarding bug workflow (Philippe Jung) 2. Re: Question regarding bug workflow (V Stuart Foote) 3. Re: Question regarding bug workflow (V Stuart Foote) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 19:21:39 +0200 From: Philippe Jung <<a href="mailto:phil.jung@free.fr">phil.jung@free.fr</a>> To: <a href="mailto:libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org">libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org</a> Subject: [Libreoffice-qa] Question regarding bug workflow Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:553D1EA3.9040900@free.fr">553D1EA3.9040900@free.fr</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi, I have questions regarding bug/fix workflow. From my understanding, developers and QA wiki pages provide only partial answers. To make it simple, I have a bug. Its status is NEW. I produced a patch to fix the problem. ---- I updated it by setting "Assigned to:" with my email and changing status to ASSIGNED. (And I guess I should have done it as soon as working on the bug). It is not clear that I have to make these two changes, one page dealing of easyhack (Development/Easy_Hacks) mentions changing "Assigned to" email but not changing status ---- I push the patch to gerrit. Who changes the status to resolved and when? A scheme on wiki QA/BSA/BugReport_Details suggests that ASSIGNED becomes RESOLVED when "Development is finished". Does development finished includes code review, merged into master... ? ---- Maybe not (only) QA related: Who commits from Gerrit into master ? In which release ? How QA team knows the bug has to be verified ? ---- Regards Philippe ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:02:42 -0700 (MST) From: V Stuart Foote <<a href="mailto:VStuart.Foote@utsa.edu">VStuart.Foote@utsa.edu</a>> To: <a href="mailto:libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org">libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org</a> Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question regarding bug workflow Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1430146962234-4147380.post@n3.nabble.com">1430146962234-4147380.post@n3.nabble.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii @Philippe, Your patch for tdf#34555 <<a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34555" target="_blank">https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34555</a>> "Make cropping handles for images (as in Draw/Impress) available for all LibreOffice applications" is sitting in the Code review queue in Gerrit. <a href="https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/15541/" target="_blank">https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/15541/</a> Depending on its merit and successful code review by other developers, it may or may not be merged. If there are issues, whomever reviews it will comment in gerrit and may ask your for changes, or make suggestions as to what needs to be corrected. It is up to you to track its status, and collaborate with the other devs on completing its merge. When the final patch is merged, the commit should be automatically reflected in the TDF bugzilla. Then, after some review by other users all seems acceptable--you as the assigned developer should close the issue as resolved fixed. Good luck, and thank you for taking the time to tackle the issue. Stuart -- View this message in context: <a href="http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Question-regarding-bug-workflow-tp4147378p4147380.html" target="_blank">http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Question-regarding-bug-workflow-tp4147378p4147380.html</a> Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:14:47 -0700 (MST) From: V Stuart Foote <<a href="mailto:VStuart.Foote@utsa.edu">VStuart.Foote@utsa.edu</a>> To: <a href="mailto:libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org">libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org</a> Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question regarding bug workflow Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1430147687988-4147381.post@n3.nabble.com">1430147687988-4147381.post@n3.nabble.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sorry, forgot to mention that if/when it is merged from Gerrit, you should add a a note in the BZ issue whiteboard, e.g. target:5.0.0 ( ref <a href="https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Advanced#target" target="_blank">https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Advanced#target</a> ) If you feel the patch should be ported back to a prior branch-- you will need to check out that branch from git and adjust/apply your patch to that code base--and if you have successful build and correct function locally thenpush it to Gerrit for code review. When "backporting" should expect a more rigorous review for complex patches being pushed to prior released branches, that is when not submitting against master. Stuart -- View this message in context: <a href="http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Question-regarding-bug-workflow-tp4147378p4147381.html" target="_blank">http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Question-regarding-bug-workflow-tp4147378p4147381.html</a> Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-qa mailing list <a href="mailto:Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org">Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa</a> ------------------------------ End of Libreoffice-qa Digest, Vol 46, Issue 21 ********************************************** </blockquote></div> </div>