[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 128933] Contextual Single mode with bad spacing and ugly lines; should look the same as Single Toolbar mode

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Thu Nov 21 14:33:07 UTC 2019


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128933

V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |needsUXEval
             Blocks|                            |102062
                 CC|                            |libreoffice-ux-advise at lists
                   |                            |.freedesktop.org,
                   |                            |vstuart.foote at utsa.edu
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.documentfounda
                   |                            |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
                   |                            |5040
            Version|3.3.3 release               |6.3.0.1 rc

--- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> ---
No, all of the Notebook Bar (NB) modes use Glade GTK .ui (aka the project's
MUFFIN interface(s)). And like the 'Contextural Single' NB, they all will show
an edge between the Menu bar and the NB GUI when the Menu bar is activated. 

Otherwise the NB Glade .UI are designed to be consistent in their spacing for
each NB mode. They achieve that--but are not meant to match the legacy
toolbars.

Simple fact is the XML "legacy" toolbars are more tightly integrated and will
appear seamless to the Menu bar.

We currently have bug 125040 for replacement of the XML based 'Single Toolbar'
by a more functional hybrid that better renders contextual widget activation.

IMHO => NAB and a => WF


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102062
[Bug 102062] [META] Notebookbar: bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list