[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 128282] restart manually numbering of numbered lists

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128282

--- Comment #21 from zionoto <zionoto at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to zionoto from comment #20)
> (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #18)
> > Restart Numbering is available when you are in a list (the confusion comes
> > again from the fact of hidden instead of disabled menu entries). Not sure
> > where the cursor is in your screenshot but tested it with master and it
> > works well.
> > 
> > So let's resolve this as WFM.
> 
> I agree with the problem of hidden menu: I prefer disabled ones because even
> if they aren't clickable users know that they exist and they are there... in
> hidden menus we don't know that.

Even sub-menus and tabbed toolbar are a problem: I prefer plain toolbars and
menus with just separators (lines that separate different groups of commands)
in this way I have to go just into that menu and I see in just a eye shoot
everything and I don't have to look for what I need in all sub-menus to find
it. Same for tabbed toolbars: with plain toolbars I point on the command and
click: simple as that. With tabbed toolbars I first have to search for the
command into all of them to find the function I'm looking for to execute and
then click on it: it's kinda of one click vs 4 or 5 clicks. Conclusion the
tabbed toolbar layout is a very time consuming layout: I deeply hate it! In
fact i keep it disabled because I work with plain toolbars that I customize as
I need to make my work faster. Simple as that. In MS Word 2003 and previous it
was great to customize and move buttons from one tool bar to another: just with
Alt+left click and drag. After just a lot of problems in finding what I need
and jumping from a tab-page to another every second: a mess. I hate MS Office >
2003 for this and I abandoned that software. Please don't make the same mistake
because LO is great just the way it is with plain toolbars. Maybe a little more
evolved but it's ok with the current philosophy.

Thanks

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.