[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149430] Clone formatting de-merges cells rather than considering the merged cells as a single cell

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149430

Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze at documentfoundation.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |108320, 114912
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze at documentfoundation.org> ---
(In reply to Rafael Lima from comment #1)
> Actually, cell merge information is considered as formatting.

While I would expect the same as the OP this comment makes it clear. 

Using a single cell with formatting as source to clone at two merged cells
makes those split (as reported), using two merged cells for two keeps the
merged state intact, and using three extends the merged size. => NAB/WF (or it
requires to completely change the merge behavior).


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108320
[Bug 108320] [META] Calc cells merging and splitting bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114912
[Bug 114912] [META] Clone formatting (aka Format Paintbrush) bugs and
enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.