[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 151691] Better distinguish shape text from shape name

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Sat Oct 22 14:47:29 UTC 2022


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151691

Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz1 at gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |needsUXEval
                 CC|                            |libreoffice-ux-advise at lists
                   |                            |.freedesktop.org

--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz1 at gmx.com> ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #2)
> I see no problem. Your shapes have no name at all, so a default enumeration
> is used to distinguish them. If that are meaningful shapes, you should name them.

I wasn't complaining about how shapes are named. Let's assume I chose those
shape names myself even.

> And I see no problem with the entries in the Animation list. Left of the
> colon is always the identifier for the shape and right of the colon the
> contained text as it is, if any.

A colon is not enough of a differentiation. Colons occur naturally in runs of
text. 

> For any other character as delimiter it can happen as well,

... which is why a delimiting character is not good enough, hence this bug.
(Caveat: Some extremely-rare character combination could theoretically work,
but probably not a good idea.)

> Interesting is the approach of PowerPoint. It does not use the text content
> to help the user to find the associated shape, but it enumerates the entries
> in the list and shows this number in a small box left to the shape in the
> slide. That way the text content is not needed at all in the list items.

That would be a separate bug... but see also my bug 151692.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list