gnome-icon-theme is LGPL3/CCBYSA3. The author of the two icons in question is Lapo I believe. I'm pretty sure he'll be willing to relicense under the terms you need. CCing. <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Stefan Knorr (Astron) <<a href="mailto:heinzlesspam@googlemail.com">heinzlesspam@googlemail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> The Gnome icons I meant are these: <a href="http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-icon-theme/plain/gnome/24x24/actions/document-save.png" target="_blank">http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-icon-theme/plain/gnome/24x24/actions/document-save.png</a> <a href="http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-icon-theme/plain/gnome/16x16/actions/document-save.png" target="_blank">http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-icon-theme/plain/gnome/16x16/actions/document-save.png</a> The 24*24 one is really amazing and very, very descriptive, the 16*16 one is maybe a bit harder to decipher, because it's more simplified, but on most systems the larger size seems to be the default anyway. Now, there's another question with regard to our icons: how are they actually licensed? The Human icon theme folder for instance, contains this: <a href="http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/icon-themes/human/CopyrightsTango" target="_blank">http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/icon-themes/human/CopyrightsTango</a> I know, Human came into the repository long after the fork. So, is that document moot now? Also, how do software licenses apply to icons, do we actually need to stress out on licensing here? Regards, Astron. [1] Although, what I didn't know, is that there's a CVS repo ... I used to download the zip archive from Wayback Machine because the Tango homepage is a bit broken currently. </blockquote></div> -- Jakub Steiner <<a href="mailto:jimmac@gmail.com">jimmac@gmail.com</a>> <a href="http://jimmac.musichall.cz">http://jimmac.musichall.cz</a>