[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Better support for distro packaging

Andreas Radke a.radke at arcor.de
Fri Jul 8 10:27:37 PDT 2011


Am Fri, 8 Jul 2011 18:33:45 +0200
schrieb Miklos Vajna <vmiklos at frugalware.org>:


> >  6 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 distro-configs/SUSE-10.1.conf
> >  create mode 100644 distro-configs/SUSE-11.1.conf
> >  create mode 100644 distro-configs/SUSE-11.2.conf
> >  create mode 100644 distro-configs/SUSE-11.3.conf
> >  create mode 100644 distro-configs/SUSE-11.4.conf
> >  create mode 100644 distro-configs/SUSE.conf
> 
> Is it a good idea to introduce distro-specific configs here? I thought
> LO packagers are supposed to put options to packaging scripts, now
> that the defaults are more-or-less sane. ;)

Yes, no need to add them back again. That should be done in the
packaging scripts.

Right now I don't see the need for any of these patches. I have LibO
pretty good under control with ArchLinux packaging tools.

I'm using make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install and then do some desktop
integration that worked automatically in old ooo-build days. This could
be improved.

The former man-page is still missing.

The most desired thing I guess are make install targets for splitted
builds(writer,calc,sdk...). I know there're files to get the file lists,
but I'm lazy here.

-Andy

http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/libreoffice/trunk/PKGBUILD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20110708/14de6510/attachment.pgp>


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list