[Libreoffice] Small Question About sal_* Types

[Michael Meeks]

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 23:44 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> the goal is also to get rid of BOOL, but again being careful with uno
> interaction: if uno -> sal_Bool otherwise bool
> (this is particularly tricky when touching the prototype of a virtual
> function... as all of the derived virtual of a given function must be
> change at once)

	Ah - indeed; I am hoping that Peter's new gcc analytics work will be
able to find instances where we got this wrong with virtual methods and
warn us. Peter - prolly another good thing to look at catching
initially.

	HTH,

		Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks at novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot