[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp
caolanm at redhat.com
Tue Mar 15 14:16:48 PDT 2011
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:54 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
> On 03/09/2011 06:01 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:46 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
> >> On 01/29/2011 03:04 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:13 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
> >>>> What about using GCC atomic builtins like in the attached patch?
> >>> Excellent, the pthread fallback always niggled me.
> >> Sorry for not thinking about this earlier, can this be cherry-picked
> >> into the 3.3 branch?
> > This doesn't affect a lot of people in practice, only the Linux
> > non-x86/x86_64 people IIRC, +1 from me if you want to stick it into 3-3.
> Great. Who can do the actual sticking into 3.3 (I can't) ?
This gone done now IIRC, right ?
More information about the LibreOffice