caolanm at redhat.com
Fri Mar 25 06:03:56 PDT 2011
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 13:55 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> It should be the current full list, with duplicates removed (i.e. once per
> every source of the problem, not once per every time it's reported). Why
> should it be that bad?
argh!, I meant to say "then things are *not* too bad", not "*too* bad".
I mean that's far less that I would have feared, quite manageable.
More information about the LibreOffice