[Libreoffice] git howto question

Michael Meeks michael.meeks at suse.com
Mon Nov 14 04:24:14 PST 2011


Hi Winfried,

On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 11:54 +0100, Winfried Donkers wrote:
> How do I update my local sources to the current (latest) master with
> git?

	Ah - it is a trick indeed :-) As Christina says - if you have commited
you can 'git pull -r' which will re-base your commit on top of the
latest code it fetches.

	Unfortunately, if someone tweaked your commit as they pushed it - that
is a tad problematic since you may get conflicts that are hard to
resolve.

	I'd personally recommend:

	git stash
	git pull -r
	git stash pop

	Then any conflicts you'll end up with (hopefully) are minimal, can be
easliy seen with 'git diff' and will not require much further
intervention ;-)

> Is 'git checkout' the proper way (run from the directory where .git
> is)?

	So - checkout is fine; but if you are sure you have your changes safely
stored as a diff somewhere - then what you can do is to re-wind your
checkout (HEAD) back, and then re-base that; so ...

	git tag -f here # just in case - so you can get back
	git stash # in case of any un-committed local changes
	git reset --hard HEAD~100 # move 100 commits back in time
	git pull -r # pull & re-base master from this point

	the last command will re-insert any of those 100 commits that were not
your local edited copies, and of course all the latest changes it has
pulled from master too.

> I have some more german-english translations for sc/source/ui/view,
> but I want to make sure that I use the latest source files before I
> commit my lines.

	Great :-) so - it seems unlikely that the code there will have changed
that much, but it's always good to check.

	Don't worry: git has a steep learning curve - steep enough that I still
have a vivid memory of climbing it ;-) when you get to the top you'll
think[1] it was worth it though. Looking forward to your patch & thanks
for helping out with the comment translation, 

	Much appreciated,

		Michael.

[1] - hard to tell if it really was of course, but you think so ;-)
-- 
michael.meeks at suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot



More information about the LibreOffice mailing list