[Libreoffice] ODBC handles, a quibble
caolanm at redhat.com
Wed Oct 5 05:31:40 PDT 2011
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 12:27 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> (*) Caolán's patch fixes also
> ODatabaseMetaDataResultSet::getTimestamp. (Hunh?
> Why does the diff say that the changed line is in
> I still think the changed function is getTimestamp.)
This is just an artefact of "patch" itself, the text on the line after
@@ can be somewhat irrelevant to what actually get patched.
I pushed my patch, mostly because its the simplest, and Lionel can
double-check it later at his leisure.
> (*) Both patches discard milliseconds. I *guess* this is
> the right thing to do, but would welcome others'
> opinions. Anyway, there is no more need for the TODO
> comment saying to ask this question.
We're kind of stuck there without a lot of work because 100ths of a
second is as good as our existing timestamps support. Probably ok given
More information about the LibreOffice