[Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] Branch libreoffice-3-5-0 created
sbergman at redhat.com
Fri Jan 27 06:12:07 PST 2012
On 01/27/2012 02:27 PM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Heh, I am getting really scared by the flood of patches waiting for
> 3-5-0 approval. Some are not trivial and it is getting dangerous.
>> But if you think / feel that actually one additional would be enough, I
>> guess we can talk about that at one of the next TSC's?
> Sure, we could discuss this. I think that we do not need 3 reviews for
> translation update, dictionaries update and similar things that are
> usually safe and can't be reasonably checked by developers.
No need to discuss from my end. I was just confused what the exact
rules are, as I noticed some changes ("illegally," as it now turns out
:) going in with only two overall reviews while other reviewers
(correctly) requested two more acks. The more the better, anyway.
More information about the LibreOffice