yet another unit test framework? -- was fdo#55814: unit test is missing

[Noel Grandin]

On 2013-04-04 10:53, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Well, IMHO the main problem with the unoapi tests wrt this is that 
> they 'centralized' a lot of the expectations on the UNO-Api -- which 
> made them hard to quickly rewrite in C++.

> If this leads to more reliable tests of any kind, which will turn into 
> tests of the C++ kind when they first fail, Im all for it.

These two statements are mutually contradictory. Either Java/Python unit 
tests are easy to convert to C++, or they are not, you can't have it 
both ways :-)

Besides, LO is a C++ program - if you can already code in C++, why would 
you want to switch to a different language to write a unit test?

Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html