Calc statistical accuracy

[Markus Mohrhard]

2013/4/21 Chris Sherlock <chris.sherlock79 at gmail.com>

> On Sunday, 21 April 2013, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
>>
>>
>> No and as long as you don't plan to work on them I doubt anyone is going
>> to do it soon.
>
>
> There's a friendly response... Where did you get that idea?
>

Please understand that posting at the developer mailing list will often
result in a response asking you to show some work in this area. This is
part of the rule of the mailing list and if you feel uncomfortable with
this you should move the discussion to the discuss list which is exactly
for that case.


>
>
>> Additionally as long as this mainly serves as theoretical discussion
>
>
> Why do you consider this to be a theoretical discussion? Don't you feel
> there is any merit in the data sets?
>

I never said there is no merit in these data sets but as long as nobody is
doing the work this is a purely theoretical discussion.


>
>
>> I think it is off-topic here and should be moved to the discuss list.
>
>
> Why is that? It's a fairly innocent enquiry.
>

Because this is the developer mailing list where we discuss code and code
related questions. General discussions that are not backed up by code
should be moved to the discuss mailing list or the user mailing list.
Please also see the general rules for the developer mailing list at
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Use_of_MailList

I'm sorry if that sounds rude but I think that discussing this without
planning on working on it is just wasted time. If you want to work on this
issues we are happy to provide you with some code pointers. As I already
mentioned in my other mail IMHO the right solution is to provide an
interface to R.

Regards,
Markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20130421/26ece24d/attachment.html>