SVG: scaling if no width/height is given

[Regina Henschel]

Hi Christina,

I have seen you patch at Gerrit now.

I think, that SvgAspectRatio::createLinearMapping is the wrong place to 
constrain the scaling because this method is used in svgimagenode.cxx 
and svgstyleattributes.cxx too. I think, that the decision whether to 
keep aspect ratio or not, should be made in the node itself. Have you 
tried to set the default settings explicitly in the constructor of 
SvgSvgNode?

Kind regards
Regina



Christina Roßmanith schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> the problem described here ->
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64125 is caused by a
> missing width and height attribute of the SVG given as an example. So,
> what would we expect given a ViewBox attribute when importing a graphic?
>
> What I'd expect is that the aspect ratio is kept and a reasonable
> scaling is applied in order to fill a page, table cell or whatever. And
> that the little green squares (handles?) behave like a bounding box for
> the graphic content. Is that correct?
>
> What I've achieved so far is the correct scaling. What I'm looking for
> is where the total size of the graphic is still determined wrong (see
> attached screenshot) -> little green squares are more like DIN A4 than
> the ViewBox size.
>
> Christina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>