GSoC mid-term evaluations NOW
Fridrich Strba
fridrich at libreoffice.org
Thu Jun 26 08:20:07 PDT 2014
I see all mentor evaluation being filled. So this should be ok by now.
F.
On 26/06/14 16:14, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi Cedric, Hi Fridrich,
>
> melange is crapping out on me. Neither my bjoern.michaelsen at gmail.com nor my
> bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com account lets me take any action/evaluation. As
> mst (co-mentor) is on vacation too and possibly hasnt filed this, please handle
> this for me. Thanks.
>
> Best,
>
> Bjoern
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:06:30AM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
>> The mid-term evaluations are just now! So, head to Google Melange and
>> submit them before Friday. In case you really can't fill the evaluation
>> your self, ask either your co-mentor or one of your beloved admins
>> (Fridrich, Thorsten or myself) to do it.
>>
>> Below are the questions of the form.
>>
>>> 1. How many years have you been a mentor for Google Summer of
>>> Code (Total - this doesn’t have to be consecutive)?
>>>
>>> 1. This is my first year
>>>
>>> 2. 2-3 years
> 2. 2-3 years
>>>
>>> 3. More than 3 years
>>>
>>> 2. If you answered “2-3 years” or “more than 3 years” as a
>>> mentor, what years did you participate?
>>>
>>> 3. How many years have you been a student in Google Summer of
>>> Code?
>>>
>>> 1. I have never been a student
> 1. I have never been a student
>>>
>>> 2. 1 year
>>>
>>> 3. 2 years
>>>
>>> 4. 3+ years
>>>
>>> 4. If you answered 2 years or 3+ years, what years did you
>>> participate as a student?
>>>
>>> 5. At what point did you first make contact with your student?
>>>
>>> 1. Before the program was announced
>>>
>>> 2. After my organization was selected to participate in
>>> Google Summer of Code
>>>
>>> 3. During the student application/acceptance phase of the
>>> program
> 3. During the student application/acceptance phase of the
> program
>>>
>>> 4. During the community bonding period
>>>
>>> 5. After the start of coding
>>>
>>> 6. How often do you and your student interact?
>>>
>>> 1. Daily
>>>
>>> 2. Every few days
>>>
>>> 3. Weekly
>>>
>>> 4. Every few weeks
> 4. Every few weeks
>>>
>>> 5. Monthly
>>>
>>> 6. Less than once a month
>>>
>>> 7. How do you communicate with your student? (Check all that
>>> apply)
>>>
>>> 1. Google+ Hangout
>>>
>>> 2. Voice (phone, Skype, etc.)
>>>
>>> 3. IM/IRC
> 3. IM/IRC
>>>
>>> 4. Private emails
>>>
>>> 5. Mailing Lists
> 5. Mailing Lists
>>>
>>> 6. Student blog updates
>>>
>>> 7. In-person meeting(s)
>>>
>>> 8. Other
>>>
>>> 8. Of the communication methods listed above, which do you use
>>> most frequently?
> IRC
>>>
>>> 9. How much time do you spend on Google Summer of Code per week
>>> (take into consideration your interactions with your student
>>> as well as time working with your org and on your own)?
>>>
>>> 1. 1-5 hours
> 1. 1-5 hours
>>>
>>> 2. 5-10 hours
>>>
>>> 3. 10-15 hours
>>>
>>> 4. 15-20 hours
>>>
>>> 5. More than 20 hours per week
>>>
>>> 10. How many time zones apart from your student are you?
>>>
>>> 1. Less than 3
>>>
>>> 2. 3-6
>>>
>>> 3. More than 6
>>>
>>> 11. How often do you require status updates from your student?
>>>
>>> 1. Daily
>>>
>>> 2. Every few days
>>>
>>> 3. Weekly
> 3. Weekly
>>>
>>> 4. Only when explicitly asked for by me
>>>
>>> 12. Please rate the quality of your interactions and
>>> communications with the student (consider his/her
>>> communication with you as well as your responses).
>>>
>>> 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the
>>> quality of communication is high)
> 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the
> quality of communication is high)
>>>
>>> 2. Good (Student is somewhat responsive and the quality
>>> of communication is okay)
>>>
>>> 3. Bad (Student is only somewhat or not at all responsive
>>> and the quality of communication is low)
>>>
>>> 13. Please rate the quality of the student’s interactions with
>>> your organization and community.
>>>
>>> 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the
>>> quality of communication is high)
> 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the
> quality of communication is high)
>>>
>>> 2. Good (Student is somewhat responsive and the quality
>>> of communication is okay)
>>>
>>> 3. Bad (Student is only somewhat or not at all responsive
>>> and the quality of communication is low)
>>>
>>> 14. Is your student on track to complete his/her project?
>>>
>>> 1. The student has already completed his/her project
>>>
>>> 2. He/she is ahead of schedule
>>>
>>> 3. He/she is on schedule
> 3. He/she is on schedule
>>>
>>> 4. He/she is behind schedule
>>>
>>> 15. Please rate the quality of code/work the student has produced
>>> thus far.
>>>
>>> 1. Amongst the best people I’ve ever worked with
>>>
>>> 2. Solid-quality performance
> 2. Solid-quality performance
>>>
>>> 3. Good performance
>>>
>>> 4. Mediocre performance
>>>
>>> 5. Disappointing or not performing at all
>>>
>>> 16. Give an example of a very good or very bad interaction you had
>>> with your student.
>
> Student proactively posts regular status updates to the project mailing list
> that give a good overview of ongoing development while still being concise.
>>>
>>> 17. Anything else you’d like to tell us or suggestions on how we
>>> could improve the program?
>>>
>>> 18. For the midterm evaluation, should this student pass or fail?
>>>
>>> 1. Pass
> 1. Pass
>>>
>>> 2. Fail
>>>
>>> 19. If you chose “fail” above, please fill in the reason for
>>> failure.
>>
>> --
>> Cedric
>> _______________________________________________
>> LibreOffice mailing list
>> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list