Should we use boost::math::log1p/expm1 instead of rtl_math_log1p/expm1 ?

[julien2412]

Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote
> Julien, I am curious if you have done any testing.
> ...

Hi Andrew,

First thank you for your feedback.
I must recognize that no, I didn't made any tests.


Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote
> No differences were found in this little test. Then again, on Fedora, 
> Boost may be configured to use the built-in implementation, I don't 
> really know. I did not check our source code, but, it might reduce the 
> LO code complexity a little bit, that might be a gain.

Ok, let's wait for a building expert about this.

Julien



--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Should-we-use-boost-math-log1p-expm1-instead-of-rtl-math-log1p-expm1-tp4122334p4122614.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.