QA test for BASIC functions

[Laurent BP]

Hi,

Following resolution of bug 102872 [1] (TAN function did not work), I wrote
some tests for many of BASIC functions with commit 30166 [2]. Arnaud Versini
proposed some improvement [3].
I was wondering if it would be better to have one test file .vb per function
:
- Advantage : in case of error (function does not work anymore), message
will be clearer as it will show the name of the function. With actual
behavior, only the name of the test file is displayed, and each test file
contains many functions
- Drawback : this will create many test files (~100 if I'm not wrong), which
may increase time of each build with check

Do you think there are more advantages than drawbacks? If yes, I'm ready to
add these functions, but I want first to know if there is some benefit.

Best regards,

Laurent BP

[1] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102872
[2]
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=commitdiff;h=8a50ea54546a51fc7a2a28174031e7351dbed10e
[3]  https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/31592/



-----
LibreOffice 5.1.4.1
--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/QA-test-for-BASIC-functions-tp4202257.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.