UI tests opening all possible dialogs

Raal raal at post.cz
Mon Jun 24 15:45:34 UTC 2019


Hi Artur,
see https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/74654/ - you can add test for 
Cancel button to existing tests.

Cheers,
Raal

On 24. 06. 19 9:22, Artur Neumann wrote:
>
> Hi Raal & Markus
>
> I've moved the tests into a new folder and skipped tests that are 
> already done in other tests. The lines have comments explaining why 
> specific tests are skipped. https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/74333/
>
> If you thing testing the "Cancel" button does not make sense, we can 
> skip even more tests.
>
> Please review and see if that makes sense to you.
>
> Greetings Artur
>
> On 2019-06-22 10:57 p.m., Raal wrote:
>> Hello Artur,
>> generally it looks useful, but please check first if such test 
>> exists. For example bug 120227 is already covered by this test 
>> https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/qa/uitest/pageFormat/tdf123508 
>> <https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123508>.py .
>> Please search first at opengrok, because uitests are quite slow and 
>> we should avoid duplicity. For example from your test
>> SearchDialogĀ  - lots of tests exists in directory 
>> /core/sc/qa/uitest/search_replace/ 
>> <https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/qa/uitest/search_replace/>
>> InsertObjectChart - lots of tests exists in directory 
>> /core/sc/qa/uitest/chart/
>> FunctionDialog - 
>> https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/qa/uitest/calc_tests7/tdf123479.py
>> etc.
>>
>> Please add your test to the new directory, see 
>> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/72376/ like an example
>> Note: the tests runs in "gen" enviroment, so gtk3 bugs we cannot test 
>> (125982 <https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125982>, 
>> 125985 <https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125985>)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Raal
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22. 06. 19 11:10, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
>>> Hello Artur,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Artur Neumann 
>>> <artur at jankaritech.com <mailto:artur at jankaritech.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Forgot the link to the changes, here it is:
>>>     https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/74333/
>>>
>>>     On 2019-06-20 5:01 p.m., Artur Neumann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     I've made some UI tests that open every dialog in calc, close
>>>>     it with the "close" or "cancel" button and if there is an "OK"
>>>>     button open it again and click the "OK" button
>>>>
>>>>     These tests should simply make sure there are no crashes by
>>>>     opening/closing the dialogues and protect against regressions like
>>>>     https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120227
>>>>     https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125982
>>>>     https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125985
>>>>
>>>>     I just wanted to have some feedback if picking those
>>>>     low-hanging fruits is a valid approach and worth the effort and
>>>>     CI time.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think that in general it is a good idea. Depending on how long it 
>>> takes to execute the test we might need to think about whether we 
>>> can actually include the tests in a normal make/make check or if 
>>> they need to be treated differently. Did you already have a chat 
>>> with Raal who has been writing tests for many bugs/dialogs already?
>>>
>>>>     If yes I could extend the tests by:
>>>>
>>>>      1. doing the same for writer, impress, etc.
>>>>      2. delete obsolete tests like uitest/calc_tests/about_test.py
>>>>      3. define preconditions for the "OK" click, e.g. input data
>>>>         into fields
>>>>      4. define assertion after the click on the "OK" button
>>>>
>>>
>>> In general this sounds like a good idea. As mentioned it might be 
>>> good to have a chat with Raal who might have an overview how far we 
>>> are in opening all dialogs already.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Markus
>>>
>>>>     Thoughts? Ideas?
>>>>
>>>>     -- 
>>>>     Artur Neumann
>>>>     Director/CTO
>>>>     Jankari Tech Pvt Ltd
>>>>     www.jankaritech.com  <http://www.jankaritech.com>
>>>>     Phone: +977 9806639223
>>>>     Skype: artur.n.
>>>>     GitHub:https://github.com/individual-it
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     LibreOffice mailing list
>>>>     LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org  <mailto:LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org>
>>>>     https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>>>
>>>     -- 
>>>     Artur Neumann
>>>     Director/CTO
>>>     Jankari Tech Pvt Ltd
>>>     www.jankaritech.com  <http://www.jankaritech.com>
>>>     Phone: +977 9806639223
>>>     Skype: artur.n.
>>>     GitHub:https://github.com/individual-it
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     LibreOffice mailing list
>>>     LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>     <mailto:LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org>
>>>     https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> LibreOffice is powered by a team of volunteers who mostly give their time for free.
>> We invite you to join as there are many ways to get involved including bugs triage,
>> marketing, UX, documentation, and of course developing -https://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LibreOffice mailing list
>> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
> -- 
> Artur Neumann
> Director/CTO
> Jankari Tech Pvt Ltd
> www.jankaritech.com
> Phone: +977 9806639223
> Skype: artur.n.
> GitHub:https://github.com/individual-it


-- 
LibreOffice is powered by a team of volunteers who mostly give their time for free.
We invite you to join as there are many ways to get involved including bugs triage,
marketing, UX, documentation, and of course developing -  https://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20190624/c37e63cc/attachment.html>


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list