It also fails without valgrind. This time I get:<div><br></div><div><div>Backtrace: [42] /home/xisco/libo/solver/300/<a href="http://unxlngi6.pro/installation/opt/program/soffice.bin">unxlngi6.pro/installation/opt/program/soffice.bin</a>: ???+0xda1</div>
<div>Exited with code '-1'</div><div>officeconnection.cxx:140:Assertion</div><div>Test name: N12_GLOBAL__N_14TestE::test</div><div>setUp() failed</div><div>- equality assertion failed</div><div>- Expected: 2</div>
<div>- Actual : 0</div><div><br></div><div>Failures !!!</div><div>Run: 1 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors: 0</div><div>dmake: Error code 1, while making 'cpptest'</div><div><br></div><div>I attach the output of ./g log --one-1</div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/3/25 Caolán McNamara <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:caolanm@redhat.com">caolanm@redhat.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 19:06 +0100, Xisco Faulí wrote:<br>
> Hello,<br>
> I'm trying to build this module with valgrind ( export<br>
> VALGRIND=memcheck ) and I get an error in cpptest.<br>
<br>
</div>Without VALGRIND=memcheck do you get an error ? The crucial bit looks<br>
right at the top with "Failed to connect to pipe: and exit -1" so lets<br>
disentangle a possible "smoketest doesn't work for me" vs "smoketest in<br>
a debugging build doesn't work for me" vs "smoketest doesn't work under<br>
valgrind".<br>
<br>
There was a little bit of fiddling around with the launcher<br>
script/program over the last few days, which I think should have settled<br>
down now. Hard to tell what someone is talking about at any given time,<br>
but the last time I checked under VALGRIND yesterday or so smoketest<br>
worked fine under valgrind for me something like ./g log --oneline -1<br>
might help there.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
C.<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>