<body> A gzipped version of the same file. Francisco Saito Em 29/03/2011 às 14:05 horas, "saito" <saito@4linux.com.br> escreveu:<blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class=""> Hi, Here is a list of files that are not supposed to have executable bit set on Unix/Linux. It is ordered by extension and is just a filtered list from the output of the tool I have sent before. Thanks. Francisco Saito Diretor de Tecnologia 55 11 99741583 55 11 21254774 Em 25/03/2011 às 19:37 horas, "Michael Meeks" <<a href="mailto:michael.meeks@novell.com">michael.meeks@novell.com</a>> escreveu:<blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><pre>Hi Saito, On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 14:50 -0300, saito wrote: > I discovered what is wrong with the perl files that dows not uses > shebangs. The perl file postprocess/rebase.pl is a valid executable > script, but it does not uses shebang. Right - it uses this env trick to avoid hard-coding the path of perl which varies cross-platform. > So I changed my script to search for "\ script" using "grep" and > "file" commands and no more file type (extensions) exclusion patterns. It seems to mis-categorise a number of things: postprocess/postprocess/packconfig/packconfig.pl But - wow, there a ton of mis-categorised files :-) if you can instead get a list of known-good mis-categorised files as a text file that we can just pass to "xargs chmod a-x" that we are certain are wrong - then we can iterate towards fixing the others too. So - as a start, just listing all the simple file types eg. .oxt, .sxw, .xls, .bas files etc. that are mis-tagged would be really useful - and lets get that lot fixed & committed. Thanks ! Michael. -- <a href="mailto:michael.meeks@novell.com"></a><a href="mailto:michael.meeks@novell.com">michael.meeks@novell.com</a> <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot </pre></blockquote> </div></blockquote> </body>