> Is there any area where you would be interested to help? I would > suggest contributing to the exporter, as that one is not under heavy > development. Interested? Yes Capable? Alas, at the present a very sad no. C looks like hieroglyphs compared the near-english Pick-Basic Database Language I use: I can read and recognize some the C words, but the C syntax is confusing. Would anyone happen to know of a tutorial program on the internet from which I could learn the necessary C syntax in order to develop the rtf importer/exporter? A download link perhaps? Until now, I have never had a need or reason to learn C. > Still, if you could put a table to the wiki containing those 66 ... Yes, I will do that if someone would explain to me how to do that. I have a couple of HTML tutorials circa msOffice97 Thanks, Tracey Miklos Vajna [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] wrote: <div class='shrinkable-quote'><div class='shrinkable-quote'> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:54:58PM -0700, tracey002 <[hidden email] > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3139135&i=0>> wrote: > > Using the downloaded source dated June 19th and 20th of 2011. > > Except for the RTFScanner.lex file (dated June 19th, 2011) which had > RTF > > Controls listed, I ended up searching for the string "RTF_" and assumed > > that the uppercase alpha characters that followed are RTF controls > (that > > appeared to be the pattern anyway). > > Yep, both the old and the new import filter uses RTF_FOO to parse \foo. > The exporter uses OOO_STRING_SVTOOLS_RTF_FOO. > > > Of the 1807 RTF Controls found in the March 2008 1.9.1 Specification, > > 1,333 need to be added to the Import Routine and 1,419 need to be added > > to the Export Routine (see attached). > > Nah, just adding them is easy - the real trick is to implement them. Is > there any area where you would be interested to help? I would suggest > contributing to the exporter, as that one is not under heavy > development. > > > 66 controls used in the import and/or export routine require definition > > because they do not appear in the March 2008 1.9.1 Specification (see > > attached). > > Attachement stripped - probably you need to get an email client instead > of nabble if you want to send attachements. > > Still, if you could put a table to the wiki containing those 66 > keywords, then we could start writing oneliner documentations for them - > that would be a great start. > > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3139135&i=1> > <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice" target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice</a> > > *attachment0* (205 bytes) Download Attachment > </attachment/3139135/0/attachment0> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion below: > <a href="http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RTF-support-tp3114982p3139135.html" target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external">http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RTF-support-tp3114982p3139135.html</a> > To unsubscribe from RTF support, click here > <<a href="" target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external"> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.901 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3745 - Release Date: 07/05/11 01:35:00 > >   </div></div> No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.901 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3745 - Release Date: 07/05/11 01:35:00 <hr align="left" width="300" /> View this message in context: <a href="http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RTF-support-tp3114982p3141100.html">Re: RTF support</a> Sent from the <a href="http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Dev-f1639786.html">Dev mailing list archive</a> at Nabble.com.