<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Andras Timar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:timar74@gmail.com">timar74@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> Hi Kaplan,<br> <br> 2011/12/4 Lior Kaplan <<a href="mailto:kaplanlior@gmail.com">kaplanlior@gmail.com</a>>:<br> <div><div class="h5">> Hi,<br> ><br> > Following Andrads's commit to the bidilanguages variable<br> > (<a href="http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=93cf9e1f2b4a269dfe4fd90945dd2f7c50277db5" target="_blank">http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=93cf9e1f2b4a269dfe4fd90945dd2f7c50277db5</a>),<br> > I've made a small cosmetic patch as these languages are RTL (which for them<br> > we need bidi support).<br> ><br> > Comments?<br> ><br> <br> </div></div>git grep -i bidi gives a lot more hits. Why would you like to change<br> two variable names, while there are a lot more occurences in function<br> names, etc. It would be more confusing than it is now.<br></blockquote></div><br>As I said this is a cosmetic change, which is aiming for correctness of the term itself.<br><br>Yes, bidi appears in a lot of places, most of them are the right use of the term. This change is small and easy to do, otherwise it wouldn't worth the time investment for something cosmetic.<br> <br>Kaplan<br></div>