Hi Lionel, Petr, *
<br/><br/>> Your format needs manual conversion to do that. But it has other
<br/>> advantages, which you describe. So <shrug> I have no strong opinion on
<br/>> this point.
<br/><br/>While you (devs) think about this would it be possible to implement
<br/>the Pretty Print date on the About box to match the date included in
<br/>the filename as suggested by Petr Mladek?
<br/><br/>This would be immediately useful for QA and l10n people testing with
<br/>daily/nightly builds.
<br/><br/>Also, as suggested by Petr
<br/><br/>> + human readable string for official builds for normal users:
<br/>>
<br/>> => I would add one more line, .e.g. 3.5.0-beta1
<br/>> it will be used only in the official builds generated from
<br/>> release tarballs or release tags
<br/><br/>Can this be added for the upcoming Beta1 or at least for Beta2 and all
<br/>future Betas and RCs?
<br/><br/>---
<br/>Pedro
<br/>
        
<br/><hr align="left" width="300" />
View this message in context: <a href="http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Naming-builds-Please-tp3556898p3565927.html">Re: Naming builds. Please???</a><br/>
Sent from the <a href="http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Dev-f1639786.html">Dev mailing list archive</a> at Nabble.com.<br/>