Don't see why we shouldn't maintain our own patched copy of gmake the same way we maintain patched copies of other components.<div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 16:12, Michael Meeks <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michael.meeks@suse.com">michael.meeks@suse.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><br> On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 11:34 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:<br> > that commit can't be the reason because the wildcards added there are<br> > for source files and mmeeks' output shows headers which are never added<br> > directly by gb_LinkTarget_add_*Object.<br> <br> </div> Hah - I think I was just being a dofus (again) and assuming my fix is<br> in gnumake 3.82 when it isn't (?) [ though to be sure a CVS [!] repo is<br> hard to track anything in ].<br> <br> ATB,<br> <div class="im HOEnZb"><br> Michael.<br> <br> --<br> <a href="mailto:michael.meeks@suse.com">michael.meeks@suse.com</a> <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot<br> <br> </div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br> LibreOffice mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org">LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>