Thank you again. Unfortunately gcc starts to support C++11 only in 4.3, and MSVC has very little C++11 in 2008 (2010 has much more). Uray M. János <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Kohei Yoshida <<a href="mailto:kohei.yoshida@gmail.com" target="_blank">kohei.yoshida@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:35 PM, János Uray <<a href="mailto:uray.janos@gmail.com">uray.janos@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > Thank you. > It's not a happy answer though. > I hoped that there are at least some little features in the intersection of > the C++11-knowledge of the supported compilers. </div>The most problematic ones are the gcc compiler used on Mac OS X (gcc 4.0?), and MSVC 2008 compilers. If you (or someone else equally interested) are willing to research those two compilers to see what subset of C++11 features they support (if at all), then I don't see why we shouldn't use those features. For the record, I'm also eager to start using C++11 too, but since the standard being so new that, we need to be realistic and allow some time for all our major platforms to support it. Kohei </blockquote></div>