<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Clean-up header includes (global/local)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65108#c14">Comment # 14</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Clean-up header includes (global/local)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65108">bug 65108</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sbergman@redhat.com" title="Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>"> <span class="fn">Stephan Bergmann</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=65108#c13">comment #13</a>)
<span class="quote">> A conforming compiler is also allowed to support only 16-bit integers</span >
No.
<span class="quote">> I don't really see the point in bringing up
> theoretical restrictions that no real-life compiler that our code would get
> near to has.</span >
This is not about bringing up theoretical restrictions. If we do such a huge
cosmetic clean-up like this, and there's two ways to do it, and one is
standards conforming ("...") while the other is not (<...>): Then if there is
no good reason to deviate from the standard, it only looks natural to me not to
do so.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>