<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Autoabandon gerrit changes with negative feedback and more than 1 month without action" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79123#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Autoabandon gerrit changes with negative feedback and more than 1 month without action" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79123">bug 79123</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:nthiebaud@gmail.com" title="Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com>"> Norbert Thiebaud</a> <pre>"No even then. The recommended way to do a working patch is using drafts:" I disagree with that.. quoting yourself from a wiki page does not make a 'recommended' way. Draft are a pain in the but... and when you wrote that it was not even possible to view other's draft for most people So the feature exist.. but is by no mean 'recommended'. "there is little harm done, when the change is abandoned under the conditions above. Reviving a abandoned change is trivial and the autoabandon is actually a helpful reminder -- better than letting them stay in limbo for months." Patch are presented typically from the newsest modified to the oldest modified. furthermore reviewed -2 patch are visually easy to detect so ... such patch do not actually interfere with normal reviewer works I do not see the ground to put the burden of 'little harm' to fellow committers by messing with their work just to make the main page 'look good' I'm not arguing against the clean-up of drive by patch not being worked upon.. but a patch uploaded by a committer, explicitly marked -2 by him should be left alone.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>