<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED --- - Character formatting not retained in entries of TOC, table lists, etc." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30732#c29">Comment # 29</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED --- - Character formatting not retained in entries of TOC, table lists, etc." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30732">bug 30732</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:owen.genat@gmail.com" title="Owen Genat <owen.genat@gmail.com>"> Owen Genat</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=30732#c28">comment #28</a>) > Confirmed fixed for subscript, superscript and italics. Confirmed for these forms of direct formatting for Table of Contents entries only. These forms are not yet supported: - Character styles using these characteristics (e.g., the pre-defined Emphasis style or custom styles using super/subscript) in ToC entries. - Illustration Index or Table Index entries (using direct formatting or a character style). - Footnote anchors (small superscripted identifier) in Table of Contents, Illustration Index, or Table Index entries. - Cross-references to any Heading, Caption, Bookmark, or Reference mark that include these forms of direct formatting or character style. > "selected character attributes" means no bold, underline, font changes, font > colours and Unicode Line Breaks, right? This may be a reference to not only a limited sub-set of characteristics, but also those applied only via direct formatting. > This will probably not satisfy Owen Genat (see <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=30732#c15">comment 15</a>) :^) That comment was mainly to point out the intricacies involved (as I saw them), particularly in relation to line breaking situations (which are likely out of scope). Italic+superscript+subscript is a good start, but I do feel it would be good if the points listed above as unsupported were included. Both the Apache issue and this bug cite other forms of index. Character styles / cross-references would seem an unfortunate omission. We do now however have a workaround. > Nice work, Tobias! I vote for VERIFIED FIXED. Well done from me also, although I am more hesitant on calling it fixed. Tested under Crunchbang 11 x86_64 running v4.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 3fdd4f069d5436cf39708004af7fda8175fbc4c2</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>