<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - LibreOffice 4.4 most annoying bugs" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79641#c73">Comment # 73</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - LibreOffice 4.4 most annoying bugs" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79641">bug 79641</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:meneerjansen00@gmail.com" title="meneerjansen00@gmail.com">meneerjansen00@gmail.com</a> <pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=79641#c72">comment #72</a>) > (In reply to meneerjansen00 from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=79641#c71">comment #71</a>) > > I take it then that we do not have to count on (work starting on) a fix for > > this bug to come anytime soon? That will be quite disappointing for a lot of > > LO users I'm afraid... > > Not at all, work on the WW8 import/export filters is continual. For example, > if you follow the samples and discussion of <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - FILEOPEN DOC/DOCX: automatic numbering in numbered lists different from Word numbering" href="show_bug.cgi?id=50774">bug 50774</a> there has been noted > improvement. > I'm afraid I do not see a lot of improvement in that bub. I do see some discussions. But no patch or suggested solution. I'm sorry > Otherwise, concise test cases with annotated comparisons in the XML of OOXML > and ODF rendering of the sample documents will provide needed incentive to > devs for correcting the filters. That as opposed to general statements that > it is "not working". > I'm afraid you lost me there. I'm willing to do anything youy want me to. But I do not understand what y'all would like me to give. Is the example doc not good enough? Can you not reproduce the bug? Please help me to provide you with the proper testing documents. On a side note, the description in <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Outline Numbering for DOCX not working when new headings inserted in between (Simple Steps in comment 3)" href="show_bug.cgi?id=76817#c3">bug 76817 comment #3</a> is crystal clear to me. And very reproducable. I'm afraid I do not know waht the devs would like more. If I would, I'd provide y'all with what you want in the bug report you want. I'd like to help or provide input, but I really do not know how anymore. <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Outline Numbering for DOCX not working when new headings inserted in between (Simple Steps in comment 3)" href="show_bug.cgi?id=76817">Bug 76817</a> commnent #3 is so clear already... > Filing useful bug reports aside, a user can put the onus back on Microsoft > and export from there as ODF (e.g. .odt), rather than OOXML (e.g. .docx). Or > in a more parochial sense work only in LibreOffice rendered ODF--that is > what LibreOffice as a project is obliged to support. In this hard dog eat dog worl I'm afraid the smaller fish has to accept that the bigger fish is boss. Same thing goed for LaTeX (www.latex-project.org) and any other way to produce documents. Best regards, Jansen</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>