<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - EPS rendering: locating pstoedit on Mac a problem" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67465#c24">Comment # 24</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - EPS rendering: locating pstoedit on Mac a problem" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67465">bug 67465</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:rhowell@uwyo.edu" title="Robert R. Howell <rhowell@uwyo.edu>"> Robert R. Howell</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=119007" name="attach_119007" title="PNG example of problems with pstoedit rendering">attachment 119007</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=119007&action=edit" title="PNG example of problems with pstoedit rendering">[details]</a> PNG example of problems with pstoedit rendering Here is the png file demonstrating the difference in rendering with LO_PREFER_GS_FOR_EPS defined (so gs is used) and with it NOT set, so pstoedit is used. In this case the problem comes because pstoedit doesn't properly clip the drawing region while gs does, but lots of other rendering problems occur in other plots. I realized after posting the above patch that I'd mistakenly appended this to <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - EPS rendering: locating pstoedit on Mac a problem" href="show_bug.cgi?id=67465">BUG 67465</a> rather than the related but probably more relevant <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Request for built-in EPS rendering ..." href="show_bug.cgi?id=67464">bug 67464</a> I'd intended to attach it too. Sorry about that. The above tests and patches WERE done on a Linux machine, rather than a Mac. Let me know if there is anything further I can do to help with this.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>