<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - EPS rendering: locating pstoedit on Mac a problem" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67465#c26">Comment # 26</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - EPS rendering: locating pstoedit on Mac a problem" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67465">bug 67465</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:rhowell@uwyo.edu" title="Robert R. Howell <rhowell@uwyo.edu>"> Robert R. Howell</a> <pre>Removing pstoedit does work as a debugging test (that's partly how I isolated the problem) but it doesn't work in practice for most users because it breaks other software packages which rely on pstoedit. If there's a way to just remove it from the LibreOffice path could you let me know? But that still is a much more obscure fix for most users than simply providing an option to explicitly set the renderer preference. If it were just me I'd simply reverse the preference from the current one, but that might have negative impacts on others. I understand this patch doesn't fix all the problems, but the pdf and printer output I get from this is still a LOT better than with pstoedit. It may not provide the enhancements requested by some, but it DOES (at least for me) fix the very bad regression which started sometime after 4.1.6. And that regression for users who DID have tolerably working EPS rendering, is what has caused the most serious complaints.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>