<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories (Usability improvement)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946#c15">Comment # 15</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Slide transitions in Impress should be sorted in meaningful categories (Usability improvement)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36946">bug 36946</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tml@iki.fi" title="Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>"> Tor Lillqvist</a> <pre>I guess the only consensus is that the current situation is not good. A list that is not sorted in any meaningful way (even if there is some "clustering" of similar transitions, but then for instance two different dissolves in widely separate locations). So something needs to be done, and (as always) preferably in small steps that can be achieved without large amounts of work (which might not be available). For instance, I don't think I have the skills or time to design graphical UI elements for categories of transitions. (Hint, hint.) Would a good first step be to divide the list into parts, with dividers, as suggested in the second example in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=36946#c12">comment #12</a>? I guess, especially taking L10N issues into consideration, that my minimal patch that simply sorts the current list <a href="https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/19648/">https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/19648/</a> is not a good idea, as it might move related transitions (that currently luckily are grouped) far from each others in languages where the more specific subtype of a transition comes first in its name?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>