<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Does this mean it’s no longer crashing?<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Chris</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 1 Jan 2016, at 3:31 PM, Chris Sherlock <<a href="mailto:chris.sherlock79@gmail.com" class="">chris.sherlock79@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">P.S. given that LO is crashing due to the ActiveX control borking, that bug still needs troubleshooting. <div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Mark, can you provide us with a backtrace when soffice dies, then add it to the TDF bug report?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Chris</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Chris Sherlock <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:chris.sherlock79@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">chris.sherlock79@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" class="">Unless I'm much mistaken, the ActiveX control does almost exactly the same thing that the browser plugin did for Netscape. <div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Given that in Edge Microsoft will not be supporting ActiveX plugins any more, isn't the justification for removing the ActiveX control the same as for remove the NSAPI plugin?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Incidentally, in the bug references, if I had to hazard a guess, the ocx needs to be registered manually. </div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Chris</div></font></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div class=""><div class="h5">On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Thorsten Behrens <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:thb@documentfoundation.org" target="_blank" class="">thb@documentfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=""><div class="h5"><span class="">Mark Hung wrote:<br class="">
> A valid use case is to read the uploaded documents on SharePoint server in<br class="">
> intranet.<br class="">
> Eventually it obsoletes, but I prefer to consider this when facing some<br class="">
> directly related event.<br class="">
> ( i.e EOL of Windows7, new toolchain ceasing ActiveX support, or security<br class="">
> issue which lacks of engineer resource ) .<br class="">
><br class="">
</span>Yeah. Unless this is not working anywhere anymore, let's keep it for<br class="">
the while - seems it's useful at least in some cases. And the cost of<br class="">
maintaining it is currently near zero, no?<br class="">
<br class="">
Cheers,<br class="">
<br class="">
-- Thorsten<br class="">
<br class=""></div></div><span class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">
LibreOffice mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org" target="_blank" class="">LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br class="">
<a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice</a><br class="">
<br class=""></span></blockquote></div><br class=""></div>
</blockquote></div><br class=""></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>