<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Register LibreOffice for Kingsoft Office file types"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82335#c28">Comment # 28</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Register LibreOffice for Kingsoft Office file types"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82335">bug 82335</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jani@documentfoundation.org" title="jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org>"> <span class="fn">jan iversen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=82335#c27">comment #27</a>)
<span class="quote">> This is actually not that easy for an easy hack, at least for Linux-based
> newbies, as building a LibreOffice that would include desktop integration
> with file type registration is clearly harder for a newbie than doing a
> normal developer-only build without any packages. As has been demonstrated
> plainly the recent weeks.
>
> Add to that then that the vast majority of our users are on Windows, and it
> is for Windows that it presumably would be of greater usefulness to
> associate with KingSoft types. Or am I mistaken?</span >
You are not mistaken, we need the registration for windows. I am however
confused we already register file types so it seems to be adding the extra file
types, what did I miss?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>