Mesa (master): i965: Don't use brw-> fragment_program in the old brw_wm_pass2.c.

[Kenneth Graunke]

Module: Mesa
Branch: master
Commit: 456c7355e06c352e1ca9e79f6ef9cdaed66ddf9c
URL:    http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=456c7355e06c352e1ca9e79f6ef9cdaed66ddf9c

Author: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
Date:   Fri Aug 31 22:50:26 2012 -0700

i965: Don't use brw->fragment_program in the old brw_wm_pass2.c.

According to Eric, this shouldn't matter since we don't do precompiles
using the old backend.  In other words, brw->fragment_program (the
currently active program) should equal c->fp (the program currently
being compiled).

However, it's just not a good idea to access brw->fragment_program
directly in compiler code.  It's totally illegal in the new backend, so
let's just not do it here either.

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
Reported-by: Paul Berry <stereotype441 at gmail.com>

---

 src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_pass2.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_pass2.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_pass2.c
index 562a189..f20e0b7 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_pass2.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_pass2.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static void init_registers( struct brw_wm_compile *c )
 
    if (intel->gen >= 6) {
       for (unsigned int j = 0; j < FRAG_ATTRIB_MAX; j++) {
-	 if (brw->fragment_program->Base.InputsRead & BITFIELD64_BIT(j)) {
+	 if (c->fp->program.Base.InputsRead & BITFIELD64_BIT(j)) {
 	    nr_interp_regs++;
 	    prealloc_reg(c, &c->payload.input_interp[j], i++);
 	 }