[Mesa-dev] [RFC] Branch maintenance

Jakob Bornecrantz jakob at vmware.com
Fri Apr 23 06:06:25 PDT 2010


On 2010-04-23 13.03, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 04:12 -0700, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
>    
>> Hi all
>>
>> So mesa has a fair bit of branches just laying around not doing
>> anything. I wrote a quick script that prints the branch name and the
>> number of commits that this branch has which are not on the master
>> branch. I have attached a full list but here is a random short list:
>>
>> gallium-s3tc: 0
>> gallium-sampler-view: 0
>> gallium-screen-context: 3
>> gallium-softpipe-winsys: 1
>> gallium-st-api: 0
>> gallium-st-api-dri: 0
>> gallium-strict-aliasing: 0
>> gallium-sw-api: 6
>> gallium-sw-api-2: 0
>> gallium-targets: 0
>> gallium-tex-surfaces: 0
>> gallium-texture-transfer: 0
>> gallium-tgsi-semantic-cleanup: 0
>> gallium-util-format-is-supported: 1
>> gallium-vertex-linear: 0
>> gallium-vertexelementcso: 0
>> gallium-wgl-rework: 0
>> gallium-winsys-handle: 7
>> gallium-winsys-handle-rebased: 0
>> gallium-winsys-private: 1
>>
>> Quite a fair bit branch that has no special commits, is it okay to
>> remove those? I know this a bit of throwing a stone in a glass house
>> considering I'm responsible for a fair bit, 4 of those just from the
>> list in the mail.
>>      
> I've been removing dead branches for quite a while now as I find them&
> have motivation.  Certainly I think we can remove all the "zero"s...
>    

Right, hmm it looks like git doesn't remove local remote branches 
automatically, so my list is quite outdated. Here is a updated list, 
have removed one zero branch that was mine. And I'm probably am going to 
remove gallium-winsys-handle (which got rebased).

Cheers Jakob.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: branches.txt
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20100423/af4b0676/attachment.txt>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list