[Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-msaa branch merge

Roland Scheidegger sroland at vmware.com
Tue May 18 10:04:23 PDT 2010


Hi,

I plan to merge the gallium-msaa branch to master soon.
It's actually a bit of a misnomer since the conceptually more important
changes in there are about blits...

Here's a short summary what this is about:
blits now operate on resources, not surfaces (surface_copy/fill ->
resource_copy/fill_region). Note that overlapping blits are no longer
permitted (half the code always assumed this wasn't the case), and these
functions are now mandatory (most of the code using these just checked
for their presence and if not used util_surface_copy instead, hence it
seems cleaner if drivers plug that in themselves, which some already did).
Also, there's an assumption that resource_copy_region works regardless
of bind flags (at least for texture targets, actually might also need to
work for buffers for "modern" drivers in the future not sure yet), hence
there are no longer any PIPE_BIND_BLIT flags (which were quite magic to
begin with, since a lot of the code could end up with a quad blit which
really wants RENDER_TARGET/SAMPLER_VIEW bind flags instead).
It is possible some of the drivers implementation are a bit suboptimal
now, as they still use surfaces internally for easier migration (svga,
r300g, nouveau might particularly benefit from some cleanup).
If a driver implements this just with util_resource_copy_region, it is
possible there are performance regressions, since some (certainly not
all) state trackers used a quad blitter instead if this wasn't available.
The u_blit code still uses a pipe_surface as destination, which should
probably be changed at some point too but the change was already big
enough imho.

Historically, blits had to operate on surfaces IIRC since there actually
were surfaces in gallium not backed by a pipe_resource (then
pipe_texture) but those are gone. So get_tex_surface() should actually
be viewed as the analogous function to create_sampler_view() (and yes it
will migrate to context too and probably renamed to something else), it
creates a view of a resource (the pipe_surface) to be used as a render
target (color or depth/stencil).

The msaa changes are fairly minimal, there's a new context function to
set the sample mask (all drivers have dummy implementations), plus some
bits for sample to coverage etc. And a explicit resource_resolve
function which is defined as the only way to resolve a multisampled
resource, but so far no driver implements multisampling (and the mesa
state tracker won't use it neither).

Comments?

Roland


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list